AI Doesn’t Think Like Humans – Insights from Our CEO’s Recent Conference Debate
Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
Our CEO Jon Salisbury recently participated in an enlightening debate at Columbus AI Week, discussing whether artificial intelligence (AI) thinks like humans. Jon argued that AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), fundamentally does not and cannot think like humans do. Here are some key takeaways from his perspective:
Experiential Differences
Jon highlighted the vast experiential gap between humans and AI. Humans have rich sensory experiences – sight, sound, touch, taste, and smell – that shape our thinking and understanding of the world. AI lacks these embodied experiences entirely.
To illustrate this, Jon asked the audience to imagine eliminating all sensory input and bodily awareness. This exercise demonstrated how alien the “experience” of an AI system is compared to human cognition rooted in physical reality.
Data Processing vs. Living Intelligence
Jon compared AI more to an advanced Excel spreadsheet than a human mind. While impressively capable of processing and correlating vast amounts of data, AI fundamentally operates on “dead” silicon rather than living biological matter. It lacks the qualities of growth, evolution, and emergent collective intelligence that characterize living systems.
Prediction vs. Understanding
An intriguing distinction Jon made was that while AI can predict patterns with uncanny accuracy, this does not equate to true understanding or knowledge. AI excels at pattern recognition and extrapolation but lacks genuine comprehension of the meaning behind the data it processes.
Limitations of Mathematical Models
While AI and human cognition may share some mathematical similarities in information processing, Jon cautioned against equating the two. He argued that our mathematical models themselves have inherent limitations and may not fully capture the nuances of biological intelligence.
Generalization and Intuition
Humans have a remarkable ability to generalize knowledge and apply intuition across domains. Jon used the example of how a person can quickly learn to avoid touching a hot surface with any part of their body, while a robot would need extensive training for each specific point of contact. This kind of intuitive, holistic understanding remains a significant challenge for AI systems.
Continuous Learning
Jon noted that humans can learn and adapt in real-time during conversations and experiences, while most AI systems require separate training phases. This dynamic, continuous learning is a crucial differentiation.
While AI continues to make remarkable strides, Jon’s insights remind us of the profound differences between artificial and biological intelligence. As we develop and deploy AI technologies, it’s crucial to remain aware of these distinctions. AI is an incredibly powerful tool, but it processes information in fundamentally different ways than the human mind.
Understanding these differences is key to leveraging AI’s strengths while recognizing its limitations. As we continue to advance AI capabilities, we must thoughtfully consider the implications of these technologies and ensure they are developed and used in ways that complement, rather than attempt to replicate, human intelligence.
Get Started Now
Ready to integrate Nexigen into your IT and cybersecurity framework?
Schedule a 30-minute consultation with our expert team
Breathe. You’ve got IT under control.
Ready to integrate Nexigen into your IT and cybersecurity framework?
Refine services and add-ons to finalize your predictable, no-waste plan
Complete the form below, and we’ll be in touch to schedule a free assessment.